Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| aira:start [2026/04/07 08:25] – [Schedule Spring 2026] mzk | aira:start [2026/04/16 14:27] (current) – [Schedule Spring 2026] mtm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| ===== Schedule Spring 2026 ===== | ===== Schedule Spring 2026 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **[RESEARCH TRACK] 2026.04.16**: | ||
| + | * Meeting link: | ||
| + | * Recording: [[https:// | ||
| + | * Presentation slides: {{: | ||
| * **[PHD TRACK] 2026.04.09**: | * **[PHD TRACK] 2026.04.09**: | ||
| * Meeting link: [[https:// | * Meeting link: [[https:// | ||
| - | * Recording: | + | * Recording: |
| * Presentation slides: | * Presentation slides: | ||
| Line 550: | Line 555: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 2026-04-16 ==== | ||
| + | <WRAP column 15%> | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column 75%> | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Speaker**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Title**: Explaining Models or Modelling Explanations? | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Abstract**: | ||
| + | Counterfactual explanations (CE) and algorithmic recourse (AR) have emerged as promising approaches towards explaining opaque machine learning models and empowering individuals affected by them. This seminar will explore unexpected challenges and new opportunities in this context and demonstrate how counterfactuals can be used to improve the trustworthiness of models . It will summarize some of the main findings of Patrick' | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Biogram**: | ||
| + | Patrick is a trained economist, computer scientist, and researcher. In his research, he has challenged long-standing paradigms in explainable AI, developed novel methods to make AI more trustworthy, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP clear></ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 2026-04-09 ==== | ||
| + | <WRAP column 15%> | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column 75%> | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Speaker**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Title**: A Time-Aware GitHub Mining Framework for Empirical Software Quality Studies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Abstract**: | ||
| + | This research focuses on designing an automated system to assess the quality of GitHub repositories based on a predefined quality model. The proposed approach evaluates repositories using a range of metrics, including commit history and its associated metadata (such as size, timestamps, and descriptions), | ||
| + | In addition, the system may incorporate further quality indicators, potentially drawing on established frameworks such as ISO/IEC 25010:2011, to provide a more comprehensive and standardized evaluation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Biogram**: | ||
| + | Software engineer with a background in the telecom domain, specializing in network management systems and Software Defined Networking (SDN). Experienced in performance engineering, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP clear></ | ||
| ==== 2026-03-26 ==== | ==== 2026-03-26 ==== | ||