Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
xaila:start [2018/10/12 07:57] – 1st draft gjnxaila:start [2019/01/18 10:56] gjn
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) 2019 Workshop ======
 +
 +**XAILA webpage [[http://xaila.geist.re]]**
 +
 +**The second edition of XAILA** will be held on the [[https://icail2019-cyberjustice.com|International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL)]], June 17-21, 2019, Montréal (Qc.), Canada
 +
 +**Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, Paulo Novais
 +
 +
 ====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) 2018 Workshop ====== ====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) 2018 Workshop ======
  
-Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, Paulo Novais+**XAILA 2018 webpage [[http://xaila.geist.re]]** 
 + 
 +**Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, Paulo Novais\\
 at the [[http://jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/|31st international conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] December 12–14, 2018 in Groningen, The Netherlands at the [[http://jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/|31st international conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] December 12–14, 2018 in Groningen, The Netherlands
  
Line 13: Line 24:
 Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives, the JURIX conference should be assessed as perfect venue for the workshop. Together we would like to address some questions like: Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives, the JURIX conference should be assessed as perfect venue for the workshop. Together we would like to address some questions like:
   * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems (including legal requirements)   * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems (including legal requirements)
-  * legal requirements for AI systems in some specific domain+  * legal requirements for AI systems in specific domains
   * legal consequences of black-box AI systems   * legal consequences of black-box AI systems
   * legal criteria for explainable and transparent AI systems   * legal criteria for explainable and transparent AI systems
Line 45: Line 56:
 Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
 Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\
 +Jose Palma, Univesidad de Murcia, Spain\\
 Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\
 Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\
 Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
 +Juan Pavón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\
 Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, Japan\\ Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, Japan\\
 Erich Schweighofer, University of Vienna, Austria\\ Erich Schweighofer, University of Vienna, Austria\\
 +Piotr Skrzypczyński, Poznań University of Technology, Poland\\
 Dominik Ślęzak, Warsaw University, Poland\\ Dominik Ślęzak, Warsaw University, Poland\\
 Michal Valco, University of Presov, Slovakia\\ Michal Valco, University of Presov, Slovakia\\
Line 56: Line 70:
 ===== Important dates ===== ===== Important dates =====
  
-  * Submission: 14.11.2018 +  * Submission: 23.<del>14</del>.11.2018 
-  * Notification:  23.11.2018 +  * Notification:  30.<del>23</del>.11.2018 
-  * Camera-ready: 30.11.2018+  * Camera-ready: 07.12.<del>30.11</del>.2018
   * Workshop:  12.12.2018   * Workshop:  12.12.2018
  
Line 64: Line 78:
 Please submit using the dedicated Easychair installation [[https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=xaila2018]] Please submit using the dedicated Easychair installation [[https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=xaila2018]]
  
-We accept long (8 pages) and short (4 pages) papers. +We accept long (8 pages) and short (4 pages) papers in PDF
 Please use the [[http://www.iospress.nl/service/authors/latex-and-word-tools-for-book-authors/ Please use the [[http://www.iospress.nl/service/authors/latex-and-word-tools-for-book-authors/
-|IOS Press LaTeX format.]]+|IOS Press format.]]
  
 ===== Proceedings ===== ===== Proceedings =====
Line 73: Line 87:
  
 ===== Call for papers ===== ===== Call for papers =====
 +{{ :xaila:xaila-cfp-v3.pdf }}
 +
 +===== Accepted papers =====
 +
 +Regular papers:
 +  * Jakub Harašta. //Trust by Discrimination: Technology Specific Regulation & Explainable AI//
 +  * Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer and Tom Van Engers. //The Role of Normware in Trustworthy and Explainable AI//
 +  * Martijn Van Otterlo and Martin Atzmueller. //On Requirements and Design Criteria for Explainability in Legal AI//
 +  * Michał Araszkiewicz and Grzegorz J. Nalepa. //Explainability of Formal Models of Argumentation Applied to Legal Domain//
 +  * Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Alexandre Rademaker. //Utilizing iALC to Formalize the Brazilian OAB Exam//
 +  * Muhammad Mudassar Yamin and Basel Katt. //Ethical Problems and Legal Issues in Development and Usage Autonomous Adversaries in Cyber Domain//
 +
 +Short papers:
 +  * Michał Araszkiewicz and Tomasz Zurek. //A Dialogical Framework for Disputed Issues in Legal Interpretation//
 +  * Veronika Žolnerčíková. //Homologation of Autonomous Machines from a Legal Perspective//
 +
 +===== Workshop Schedule =====
 +9.45-10.10 <del>9.30-9.40</del> - **Introduction** (conference chairs)\\
 +<del>9.40-10.10 -  Jakub Harašta. Trust by Discrimination: Technology Specific Regulation & Explainable AI</del>\\
 +10.10-10.40 - Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer and Tom Van Engers. The Role of Normware in Trustworthy and Explainable AI\\ 
 +10.40-11.00 - Michał Araszkiewicz and Tomasz Zurek. A Dialogical Framework for Disputed Issues in Legal Interpretation
 +
 +11.00-11.30 - **Coffee break**
 +
 +11.30-12.30 - **Keynote lecture: [[http://www.ai.rug.nl/~verheij|Bart Verheij]]: Good AI and Law**\\
 +Abstract: //AI's successes are these days so prominent that---if we believe reports in the news---the times seem near that machines perform better at any human task than humans themselves. At the same time the prominent AI technique of neural networks---today typically called deep learning---is often considered to lead to black box results, hindering transparency, explainability and responsibility, values that are central in the domain of law. So in that specific sense, the distance between neural network AI and the needs of the law is vast. In this talk, it is claimed that for good AI & Law we need an AI that can provide good answers to our questions, has good reasons for them and makes good choices. It is argued that the path towards good AI & Law requires the integration of data-driven and knowledge-based AI, and that argumentation as it occurs in the law can show the way to such integration.//
 +
 +Bio: //Prof. Bart Verheij holds the chair of artificial intelligence and argumentation at the University of Groningen. He is head of the department of Artificial Intelligence in the Bernoulli Institute of Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Science and Engineering. He participates in the Multi-Agent Systems research program. His research focuses on artificial intelligence and argumentation, often with the law as application domain. He is currently working on the connections between knowledge, data and reasoning, as a contribution to explainable, responsible and social artificial intelligence. He is president of the International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law (IAAIL).//
 + 
 +12.30-13.00 - Michał Araszkiewicz and Grzegorz J. Nalepa. Explainability of Formal Models of Argumentation Applied to Legal Domain\\
 +13.00-14.00 - **Lunch**
 +
 +14.00-14.30 -  Martijn Van Otterlo and Martin Atzmueller. On Requirements and Design Criteria for Explainability in Legal AI
 +\\
 +14.30-15.00 - Muhammad Mudassar Yamin and Basel Katt. Ethical Problems and Legal Issues in Development and Usage Autonomous Adversaries in Cyber Domain
 +
 +15.00-15.30 - **Coffee break**
 +
 +15.30-16.00 - Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Alexandre Rademaker. Utilizing iALC to Formalize the Brazilian OAB Exam\\
 +16.00-16.20 - Veronika Žolnerčíková. Homologation of Autonomous Machines from a Legal Perspective\\
 +16.20-16:45 - **XAILA, closing & open discussion**
  
xaila/start.txt · Last modified: 2021/11/27 17:39 by gjn
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0