Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
xaila:start [2018/10/15 10:06] – [Submission] pdf gjn | xaila:start [2019/12/11 14:03] – [Workshop Schedule] talk slides gjn | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) | + | ====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) Workshop ====== |
- | **XAILA | + | **XAILA webpage [[http:// |
+ | [[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was | ||
**Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | **Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
at the [[http:// | at the [[http:// | ||
+ | [[start2018|See the dedicated page for XAILA2018]] | ||
- | ===== Abstract ===== | + | We also proposed XAILA to be held on the [[https:// |
- | Humanized AI emphasizes transparency | + | [[icail2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019@ICAIL]] |
- | ===== Motivation | + | **The second edition of XAILA** is Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, |
+ | at the [[https:// | ||
+ | December 11, 2019, Madrid, Spain in ETSI Minas y Energía School (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== XAILA 2019 at Jurix 2019 ===== | ||
+ | ==== Workshop Schedule ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Location: **The next building after registration, | ||
+ | |||
+ | 9:30- 9:45 XAILA Chairs - Workshop Opening\\ | ||
+ | | ||
+ | 10:10-10:35 Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
+ | 10:35-11:00 Break\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 11:00-11:45 //Invited talk:// María Jesús González-Espejo, | ||
+ | 11:45-12:10 Oana Ichim: // | ||
+ | 12:10-12:35 Ramon Ruiz-Dolz, José Alemany, Stella Heras and Ana Garcia-Fornes: | ||
+ | 12:35-13 00 Michal Klincewicz and Lily Frank: //Emerging ethical and legal issues in healthcare machine learning// | ||
+ | 13:00 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Organizers | ||
+ | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Abstract ==== | ||
+ | Humanized AI emphasizes transparency and explainability in AI systems. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension, that is most often analyzed by philosophers. However, in order for it to be fruitful for AI engineers, it has to be properly focused. The intersection of Law and AI that makes it possible, as it provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of HAI systems and their social impact. It is a timely issue for the AI and Law community. | ||
+ | ==== Motivation for the workshop and description ==== | ||
Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers, | Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers, | ||
We believe, that it is the intersection of Law and AI that makes such an endeavor possible. Together, this lays foundations and provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. Therefore, when discussing ethical consequences and considerations of transparent and explainable AI systems, including affective systems, we should focus on the legal conceptual framework. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of XAI systems and their social impact. As such it is a very timely issue for the AI and Law community. | We believe, that it is the intersection of Law and AI that makes such an endeavor possible. Together, this lays foundations and provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. Therefore, when discussing ethical consequences and considerations of transparent and explainable AI systems, including affective systems, we should focus on the legal conceptual framework. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of XAI systems and their social impact. As such it is a very timely issue for the AI and Law community. | ||
Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives, | Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives, | ||
- | * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems | + | |
- | * legal requirements for AI systems in some specific domain | + | |
* legal consequences of black-box AI systems | * legal consequences of black-box AI systems | ||
- | * legal criteria for explainable and transparent AI systems | + | * legal criteria |
* possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | ||
* ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life | * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life | ||
+ | * the notion of right to explanation | ||
* relation of XAI and argumentation technologies | * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies | ||
- | * XAI models and architectures | + | * XAI models, approaches |
- | * understanding of the notions of explanation | + | * XAI and declarative domain knowledge |
- | * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment | + | * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment |
- | * incorporating | + | * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems |
* XAI, privacy and data protection | * XAI, privacy and data protection | ||
* possible legal aspects and consequences of affective systems | * possible legal aspects and consequences of affective systems | ||
- | * legal requirements and risks in AI applications | ||
* XAI, certification and compliance | * XAI, certification and compliance | ||
- | ===== Program | + | ==== List of members of the program |
Martin Atzmueller, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | Martin Atzmueller, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
Line 39: | Line 67: | ||
David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | ||
- | Colette Cuijpers, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
- | Rafał Michalczak, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | ||
Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
Line 48: | Line 74: | ||
Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | ||
Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | ||
+ | Juan Pavón Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | ||
Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
Erich Schweighofer, | Erich Schweighofer, | ||
- | Dominik Ślęzak, Warsaw University, Poland\\ | + | Michal Valco, |
- | Michal Valco, University | + | |
Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland | ||
- | ===== Important dates ===== | + | ==== Important dates ==== |
+ | Submission: 25.11.2019\\ | ||
+ | Notification: | ||
+ | Corrected papers: 06.12.2019\\ | ||
+ | Workshop: | ||
- | * Submission: 14.11.2018 | + | ====Submission |
- | * Notification: | + | Please submit |
- | * Camera-ready: | + | [[https:// |
- | * Workshop: | + | We are accepting short papers – 5 pages with references, |
- | + | All submissions should be formatted using the styles and guidelines in the IOS Press Instructions for Authors | |
- | ===== Submission | + | |
- | Please submit using the dedicated Easychair installation [[https:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | We accept long (8 pages) and short (4 pages) papers | + | |
- | Please use the [[http:// | + | |
- | |IOS Press format.]] | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===== Proceedings ===== | + | |
Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. | Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. | ||
A post workshop journal publication is considered. | A post workshop journal publication is considered. | ||
- | ===== Call for papers ===== | + | |
- | {{ : | + |