Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
xaila:start [2018/10/15 12:06]
gjn [Submission] pdf
xaila:start [2019/10/12 07:31] (current)
gjn [List of members of the program committee (tentative)]
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) ​2018 Workshop ======+====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) Workshop ======
  
-**XAILA ​2018 webpage [[http://​xaila.geist.re]]**+**XAILA webpage [[http://​xaila.geist.re]]**
  
 +[[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was 
 **Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais\\ **Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais\\
 at the [[http://​jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/​|31st international conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] December 12–14, 2018 in Groningen, The Netherlands at the [[http://​jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/​|31st international conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] December 12–14, 2018 in Groningen, The Netherlands
 +[[start2018|See the dedicated page for XAILA2018]]
  
-===== Abstract ===== +We also proposed XAILA to be held on the [[https://​icail2019-cyberjustice.com|International Conference on Artificial Intelligence ​and Law (ICAIL)]]June 17-212019Montréal (Qc.)CanadaWhile the workshop ​was met with a large interest, and attracted many registered participants,​ surprisingly too few papers were actually submitted 
-Humanized AI emphasizes transparency ​and explainability in AI systems. These perspectives have an important ethical dimensionthat is most often analyzed by philosophers. Howeverin order for it to be fruitful for AI engineersit has to be properly focusedThe intersection of Law and AI that makes it possibleas it provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systemsA significant part of AI and Law research during ​the last two decades ​was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking ​with values. These results may now be reconsidered in broader contextconcerning the development of HAI systems ​and their social impactIt is a timely issue for the AI and Law community.+[[icail2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019@ICAIL]]
  
-===== Motivation and workshop topics ​=====+**The second edition of XAILA** is Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais\\ 
 +at the [[https://​jurix2019.oeg-upm.net/​|JURIX 2019 32nd International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] on the  
 +December 11, 2019, Madrid, Spain in ETSI Minas y Energía School (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) 
 + 
 +===== XAILA 2019 at Jurix 2019 ===== 
 + 
 +==== Organizers ====  
 +Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais 
 + 
 +==== Abstract ====  
 +Humanized AI emphasizes transparency and explainability in AI systems. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension, that is most often analyzed by philosophers. However, in order for it to be fruitful for AI engineers, it has to be properly focused. The intersection of Law and AI that makes it possible, as it provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of HAI systems and their social impact. It is a timely issue for the AI and Law community.
  
 +==== Motivation for the workshop and description ====
 Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers,​ in order for it to be fruitful for engineers in AI, it has to be properly focused with specific concepts and operationalized. Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers,​ in order for it to be fruitful for engineers in AI, it has to be properly focused with specific concepts and operationalized.
 We believe, that it is the intersection of Law and AI that makes such an endeavor possible. Together, this lays foundations and provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. Therefore, when discussing ethical consequences and considerations of transparent and explainable AI systems, including affective systems, we should focus on the legal conceptual framework. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of XAI systems and their social impact. As such it is a very timely issue for the AI and Law community. We believe, that it is the intersection of Law and AI that makes such an endeavor possible. Together, this lays foundations and provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. Therefore, when discussing ethical consequences and considerations of transparent and explainable AI systems, including affective systems, we should focus on the legal conceptual framework. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of XAI systems and their social impact. As such it is a very timely issue for the AI and Law community.
 Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives,​ the JURIX conference should be assessed as perfect venue for the workshop. Together we would like to address some questions like: Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives,​ the JURIX conference should be assessed as perfect venue for the workshop. Together we would like to address some questions like:
-  * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems ​(including legal requirements) +  ​* the notions of transparency,​ interpretability and explainability in XAI 
-  * legal requirements for AI systems in some specific domain+  ​* non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems
   * legal consequences of black-box AI systems   * legal consequences of black-box AI systems
-  * legal criteria for explainable and transparent AI systems+  * legal criteria ​and requirements ​for explainable and transparent AI systems
   * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation,​ legal practice, teaching and research   * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation,​ legal practice, teaching and research
   * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life   * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life
 +  * the notion of right to explanation
   * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies   * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies
-  * XAI models and architectures +  * XAI models, approaches ​and architectures 
-  * understanding of the notions of explanation ​and transparency in XAI  +  * XAI and declarative domain knowledge 
-  * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment  +  * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment 
-  * incorporating ​ethical values into AI systems ​and the legal interpretation and consequences ​of this process+  * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems ​& its legal interpretation and consequences
   * XAI, privacy and data protection   * XAI, privacy and data protection
   * possible legal aspects and consequences of affective systems   * possible legal aspects and consequences of affective systems
-  * legal requirements and risks in AI applications 
   * XAI, certification and compliance   * XAI, certification and compliance
  
-===== Program ​committee ​=====+==== List of members of the program ​committee ​(tentative) ​====
  
 Martin Atzmueller, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Martin Atzmueller, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
Line 39: Line 52:
 David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\
 Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\
-Colette Cuijpers, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ 
-Rafał Michalczak, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ 
 Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\
 Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\
Line 48: Line 59:
 Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\
 Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\
 +Juan Pavón Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\
 Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\
 Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
 Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics,​ Japan\\ Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics,​ Japan\\
 Erich Schweighofer,​ University of Vienna, Austria\\ Erich Schweighofer,​ University of Vienna, Austria\\
-Dominik Ślęzak, Warsaw University, Poland\\ +Michal Valco, ​Constantine the Philosopher ​University ​in Nitra, Slovakia\\
-Michal Valco, University ​of Presov, Slovakia\\+
 Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland
  
-===== Important dates =====+==== Important dates ==== 
 +Submission: 14.11.2019\\ 
 +Notification: ​ 24.11.2019\\ 
 +Corrected papers: 30.12.2019\\ 
 +Workshop: ​ 11.12.2019\\
  
-  * Submission: 14.11.2018 +====Submission ​and proceedings==== 
-  * Notification: ​ 23.11.2018 +Please submit ​papers ​using the dedicated Easychair installation ​ 
-  * Camera-ready:​ 30.11.2018 +[[https://​easychair.org/​conferences/?​conf=xaila2019]] 
-  * Workshop: ​ 12.12.2018 +We are accepting short papers – 5 pages with references, ​and long papers – 10 pages. We are encouraging both original research papers, as well position ​papers. 
- +All submissions should be formatted using the styles and guidelines in the IOS Press Instructions for Authors ​http://​www.iospress.nl/​service/​authors/​latex-and-word-tools-for-book-authors
-===== Submission ​===== +
-Please submit using the dedicated Easychair installation [[https://​easychair.org/​conferences/?​conf=xaila2018]] +
- +
-We accept long (8 pagesand short (4 pagespapers ​in PDF.  +
-Please use the [[http://​www.iospress.nl/​service/​authors/​latex-and-word-tools-for-book-authors+
-|IOS Press format.]] +
- +
-===== Proceedings =====+
 Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. ​ Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. ​
 A post workshop journal publication is considered. A post workshop journal publication is considered.
  
-===== Call for papers ===== +
-{{ :​xaila:​xaila-cfp-v1.pdf }}+
xaila/start.1539597986.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/10/15 12:06 by gjn
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0