Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
xaila:start [2018/12/06 13:56]
gjn [Workshop Schedule] Martin's talk
xaila:start [2019/10/12 07:31] (current)
gjn [List of members of the program committee (tentative)]
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) ​2018 Workshop ======+====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) Workshop ======
  
-**XAILA ​2018 webpage [[http://​xaila.geist.re]]**+**XAILA webpage [[http://​xaila.geist.re]]**
  
 +[[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was 
 **Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais\\ **Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais\\
 at the [[http://​jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/​|31st international conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] December 12–14, 2018 in Groningen, The Netherlands at the [[http://​jurix2018.ai.rug.nl/​|31st international conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] December 12–14, 2018 in Groningen, The Netherlands
 +[[start2018|See the dedicated page for XAILA2018]]
  
-===== Abstract ​=====+We also proposed XAILA to be held on the [[https://​icail2019-cyberjustice.com|International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL)]], June 17-21, 2019, Montréal (Qc.), Canada. While the workshop was met with a large interest, and attracted many registered participants,​ surprisingly too few papers were actually submitted.  
 +[[icail2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019@ICAIL]] 
 + 
 +**The second edition of XAILA** is Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais\\ 
 +at the [[https://​jurix2019.oeg-upm.net/​|JURIX 2019 32nd International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] on the  
 +December 11, 2019, Madrid, Spain in ETSI Minas y Energía School (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) 
 + 
 +===== XAILA 2019 at Jurix 2019 ===== 
 + 
 +==== Organizers ====  
 +Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais 
 + 
 +==== Abstract ​==== 
 Humanized AI emphasizes transparency and explainability in AI systems. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension, that is most often analyzed by philosophers. However, in order for it to be fruitful for AI engineers, it has to be properly focused. The intersection of Law and AI that makes it possible, as it provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of HAI systems and their social impact. It is a timely issue for the AI and Law community. Humanized AI emphasizes transparency and explainability in AI systems. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension, that is most often analyzed by philosophers. However, in order for it to be fruitful for AI engineers, it has to be properly focused. The intersection of Law and AI that makes it possible, as it provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of HAI systems and their social impact. It is a timely issue for the AI and Law community.
  
-===== Motivation and workshop topics ===== +==== Motivation ​for the workshop ​and description ​====
 Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers,​ in order for it to be fruitful for engineers in AI, it has to be properly focused with specific concepts and operationalized. Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers,​ in order for it to be fruitful for engineers in AI, it has to be properly focused with specific concepts and operationalized.
 We believe, that it is the intersection of Law and AI that makes such an endeavor possible. Together, this lays foundations and provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. Therefore, when discussing ethical consequences and considerations of transparent and explainable AI systems, including affective systems, we should focus on the legal conceptual framework. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of XAI systems and their social impact. As such it is a very timely issue for the AI and Law community. We believe, that it is the intersection of Law and AI that makes such an endeavor possible. Together, this lays foundations and provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. Therefore, when discussing ethical consequences and considerations of transparent and explainable AI systems, including affective systems, we should focus on the legal conceptual framework. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of XAI systems and their social impact. As such it is a very timely issue for the AI and Law community.
 Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives,​ the JURIX conference should be assessed as perfect venue for the workshop. Together we would like to address some questions like: Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives,​ the JURIX conference should be assessed as perfect venue for the workshop. Together we would like to address some questions like:
-  * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems ​(including legal requirements) +  ​* the notions of transparency,​ interpretability and explainability in XAI 
-  * legal requirements for AI systems in specific domains+  ​* non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems
   * legal consequences of black-box AI systems   * legal consequences of black-box AI systems
-  * legal criteria for explainable and transparent AI systems+  * legal criteria ​and requirements ​for explainable and transparent AI systems
   * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation,​ legal practice, teaching and research   * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation,​ legal practice, teaching and research
   * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life   * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life
 +  * the notion of right to explanation
   * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies   * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies
-  * XAI models and architectures +  * XAI models, approaches ​and architectures 
-  * understanding of the notions of explanation ​and transparency in XAI  +  * XAI and declarative domain knowledge 
-  * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment  +  * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment 
-  * incorporating ​ethical values into AI systems ​and the legal interpretation and consequences ​of this process+  * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems ​& its legal interpretation and consequences
   * XAI, privacy and data protection   * XAI, privacy and data protection
   * possible legal aspects and consequences of affective systems   * possible legal aspects and consequences of affective systems
-  * legal requirements and risks in AI applications 
   * XAI, certification and compliance   * XAI, certification and compliance
  
-===== Program ​committee ​=====+==== List of members of the program ​committee ​(tentative) ​====
  
 Martin Atzmueller, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Martin Atzmueller, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
Line 39: Line 52:
 David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\
 Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\
-Colette Cuijpers, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ 
-Rafał Michalczak, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ 
 Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\
 Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\
Line 47: Line 58:
 Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
 Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\
-Jose Palma, Univesidad de Murcia, Spain\\ 
 Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\
 +Juan Pavón Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\
 Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\
 Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
-Juan Pavón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\ 
 Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics,​ Japan\\ Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics,​ Japan\\
 Erich Schweighofer,​ University of Vienna, Austria\\ Erich Schweighofer,​ University of Vienna, Austria\\
-Piotr Skrzypczyński,​ Poznań University of Technology, Poland\\ +Michal Valco, ​Constantine the Philosopher ​University ​in Nitra, Slovakia\\
-Dominik Ślęzak, Warsaw University, Poland\\ +
-Michal Valco, University ​of Presov, Slovakia\\+
 Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland
  
-===== Important dates =====+==== Important dates ==== 
 +Submission: 14.11.2019\\ 
 +Notification: ​ 24.11.2019\\ 
 +Corrected papers: 30.12.2019\\ 
 +Workshop: ​ 11.12.2019\\
  
-  * Submission: 23.<​del>​14</​del>​.11.2018 +====Submission ​and proceedings==== 
-  * Notification: ​ 30.<​del>​23</​del>​.11.2018 +Please submit ​papers ​using the dedicated Easychair installation ​ 
-  * Camera-ready:​ 07.12.<​del>​30.11</​del>​.2018 +[[https://​easychair.org/​conferences/?​conf=xaila2019]] 
-  * Workshop: ​ 12.12.2018 +We are accepting short papers – 5 pages with references, ​and long papers – 10 pages. We are encouraging both original research papers, as well position ​papers. 
- +All submissions should be formatted using the styles and guidelines in the IOS Press Instructions for Authors ​http://​www.iospress.nl/​service/​authors/​latex-and-word-tools-for-book-authors
-===== Submission ​===== +
-Please submit using the dedicated Easychair installation [[https://​easychair.org/​conferences/?​conf=xaila2018]] +
- +
-We accept long (8 pagesand short (4 pagespapers ​in PDF.  +
-Please use the [[http://​www.iospress.nl/​service/​authors/​latex-and-word-tools-for-book-authors+
-|IOS Press format.]] +
- +
-===== Proceedings =====+
 Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. ​ Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. ​
 A post workshop journal publication is considered. A post workshop journal publication is considered.
  
-===== Call for papers ===== 
-{{ :​xaila:​xaila-cfp-v3.pdf }} 
- 
-===== Accepted papers ===== 
- 
-Regular papers: 
-  * Jakub Harašta. //Trust by Discrimination:​ Technology Specific Regulation & Explainable AI// 
-  * Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer and Tom Van Engers. //The Role of Normware in Trustworthy and Explainable AI// 
-  * Martijn Van Otterlo and Martin Atzmueller. //Two Tales of Explainability for Legal AI// 
-  * Michał Araszkiewicz and Grzegorz J. Nalepa. //​Explainability of Formal Models of Argumentation Applied to Legal Domain// 
-  * Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Alexandre Rademaker. //Utilizing iALC to Formalize the Brazilian OAB Exam// 
-  * Muhammad Mudassar Yamin and Basel Katt. //Ethical Problems and Legal Issues in Development and Usage Autonomous Adversaries in Cyber Domain// 
- 
-Short papers: 
-  * Michał Araszkiewicz and Tomasz Zurek. //A Dialogical Framework for Disputed Issues in Legal Interpretation//​ 
-  * Veronika Žolnerčíková. //​Homologation of Autonomous Machines from a Legal Perspective//​ 
- 
-===== Workshop Schedule ===== 
-9.30-9.40 - **Introduction** (conference chairs)\\ 
-9.40-10.10 -  Jakub Harašta. Trust by Discrimination:​ Technology Specific Regulation & Explainable AI\\ 
-10.10-10.40 - Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer and Tom Van Engers. The Role of Normware in Trustworthy and Explainable AI\\  
-10.40-11.00 - Michał Araszkiewicz and Tomasz Zurek. A Dialogical Framework for Disputed Issues in Legal Interpretation 
- 
-11.00-11.30 - **Coffee break** 
- 
-11.30-12.30 - **Keynote lecture: [[http://​www.ai.rug.nl/​~verheij|Bart Verheij]]: Good AI and Law**\\ 
-//Bart Verheij holds the chair of artificial intelligence and argumentation at the University of Groningen. He is head of the department of Artificial Intelligence in the Bernoulli Institute of Mathematics,​ Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence,​ Faculty of Science and Engineering. He participates in the Multi-Agent Systems research program. His research focuses on artificial intelligence and argumentation,​ often with the law as application domain. He is currently working on the connections between knowledge, data and reasoning, as a contribution to explainable,​ responsible and social artificial intelligence. He is president of the International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law (IAAIL).// 
-  
-12.30-13.00 - Michał Araszkiewicz and Grzegorz J. Nalepa. Explainability of Formal Models of Argumentation Applied to Legal Domain\\ 
-13.00-14.00 - **Lunch** 
- 
-14.00-14.30 -  Martijn Van Otterlo and Martin Atzmueller. On Requirements and Design Criteria for Explainability in Legal AI 
-\\ 
-14.30-15.00 - Muhammad Mudassar Yamin and Basel Katt. Ethical Problems and Legal Issues in Development and Usage Autonomous Adversaries in Cyber Domain 
- 
-15.00-15.30 - **Coffee break** 
- 
-15.30-16.00 - Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Alexandre Rademaker. Utilizing iALC to Formalize the Brazilian OAB Exam\\ 
-16.00-16.20 - Veronika Žolnerčíková. Homologation of Autonomous Machines from a Legal Perspective\\ 
-16.20-16:45 - **XAILA, closing & open discussion** 
  
xaila/start.1544101018.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/12/06 13:56 by gjn
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0