Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
xaila:start [2019/03/23 18:13]
gjn [List of members of the program committee]
xaila:start [2019/12/11 15:03] (current)
gjn [Workshop Schedule] talk slides
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 **XAILA webpage [[http://​xaila.geist.re]]** **XAILA webpage [[http://​xaila.geist.re]]**
- 
-**The second edition of XAILA** will be held on the [[https://​icail2019-cyberjustice.com|International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL)]], June 17-21, 2019, Montréal (Qc.), Canada 
- 
-**Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais 
  
 [[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was  [[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was 
Line 12: Line 8:
 [[start2018|See the dedicated page for XAILA2018]] [[start2018|See the dedicated page for XAILA2018]]
  
-===== XAILA2019@ICAIL ​=====+We also proposed XAILA to be held on the [[https://​icail2019-cyberjustice.com|International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL)]], June 17-21, 2019, Montréal (Qc.), Canada. While the workshop was met with a large interest, and attracted many registered participants,​ surprisingly too few papers were actually submitted.  
 +[[icail2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019@ICAIL]]
  
-The 2nd EXplainable AI in Law Workshop (XAILA2019@ICAIL) +**The second edition of XAILA** is Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais\\ 
-at the  +at the [[https://jurix2019.oeg-upm.net/|JURIX 2019 32nd International Conference on Legal Knowledge ​and Information Systems]] on the  
-[[https://icail2019-cyberjustice.com|17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence ​and Law (ICAIL2019)]] +December 11, 2019, Madrid, Spain in ETSI Minas y Energía School ​(Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)
-June 17-21, 2019, Montréal ​(Qc.), Canada ​+
  
 +===== XAILA 2019 at Jurix 2019 =====
 +==== Workshop Schedule ====
  
-OrganizersGrzegorz J. NalepaMartin AtzmuellerMichał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais+Location**The next building after registrationRoom 272nd floor**
  
-==== Workshop and description ====+ 9:30- 9:45 XAILA Chairs - Workshop ​Opening\\ 
 + ​9:​45-10:​10 Francesco Sovrano, Fabio Vitali ​and Monica Palmirani: //The difference between Explainable and Explaining: requirements and challenges under the GDPR//\\ 
 +10:10-10:35 Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Slawomir Nowaczyk and Szymon Bobek: //Building Trust to AI Systems Through Explainability. Technical and legal perspectives//​\\ 
 +10:35-11:00 Break\\
  
-Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systemsincluding transparency and explainability (XAI)The idea of XAI has recently emerged ​as one of the most debated topics not only in the scientific community, but also in the general public. The design and use of AI algorithms raises important engineeringsocietalethical ​and legal challenges. In particular, AI-enhanced tools are used in commercial settings (advertisement,​ e-marketing), civil and labour law relations (such as employee assessment ​and recruitment processes), financial markets, penitentiary systems as well as in medical diagnosis etc. The decisions taken with the support of or directly based on the results generated by AI have more and more impact on the life of societies of individuals. Machine Learning tools are also intensively developed with an intention of application in the field of legal services provision and legal decision-making process. Understandability of the operations of these algorithms, as well as the provisioning of explanations with regard to the decision making process ​in the AI systems is of profound importance. Furthermore,​ only these features can lay foundations for the proper discussion of the ethical aspects of AI systems. The workshop’s idea is to discuss the current state of the art with respect to these broad yet important multidisciplinary challenges as well as the prospects for the future.+11:00-11:45 //Invited talk:// María Jesús González-Espejo[[https://​institutodeinnovacionlegal.com/​|Instituto de Innovacion Legal]]: //{{ :​xaila:​xaila2019-talk-iil_presentation_v1.pdf |Drivers for Adopting Legal AI}}//\\ 
 +11:45-12:10 Oana Ichim: //​Counterintuitive reasoning ​as non-functional design ​in the field of human rights adjudication//​\\ 
 +12:10-12:35 Ramon Ruiz-DolzJosé AlemanyStella Heras and Ana Garcia-Fornes: //Automatic Generation of Explanations to Prevent Privacy Violations//​\\ 
 +12:35-13 00 Michal Klincewicz ​and Lily Frank: //Emerging ethical ​and legal issues ​in healthcare machine learning//​\\ 
 +13:00       ​Lunch\\
  
-==== Topics ==== 
  
-The scope of the XAILA workshop ​encompasses ​broad array of topics ​including, ​but not limited ​to:+==== Organizers ====  
 +Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz,​ Paulo Novais 
 + 
 +==== Abstract ====  
 +Humanized AI emphasizes transparency and explainability in AI systems. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension, that is most often analyzed by philosophers. However, in order for it to be fruitful for AI engineers, it has to be properly focused. ​The intersection ​of Law and AI that makes it possible, as it provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of HAI systems and their social impact. It is a timely issue for the AI and Law community. 
 + 
 +==== Motivation for the workshop ​and description ==== 
 +Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers,​ in order for it to be fruitful for engineers in AI, it has to be properly focused with specific concepts and operationalized. 
 +We believe, that it is the intersection of Law and AI that makes such an endeavor possible. Together, this lays foundations and provides ​conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. Therefore, when discussing ethical consequences and considerations ​of transparent and explainable AI systems, ​including ​affective systemswe should focus on the legal conceptual framework. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of XAI systems and their social impact. As such it is a very timely issue for the AI and Law community. 
 +Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives,​ the JURIX conference should be assessed as perfect venue for the workshop. Together we would like to address some questions like:
   * the notions of transparency,​ interpretability and explainability in XAI   * the notions of transparency,​ interpretability and explainability in XAI
-  * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems ​(including legal requirements)+  * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems
   * legal consequences of black-box AI systems   * legal consequences of black-box AI systems
-  * legal criteria for explainable and transparent AI systems+  * legal criteria ​and requirements ​for explainable and transparent AI systems
   * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation,​ legal practice, teaching and research   * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation,​ legal practice, teaching and research
   * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life   * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life
   * the notion of right to explanation   * the notion of right to explanation
   * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies   * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies
-  * XAI models and architectures+  * XAI models, approaches ​and architectures 
 +  * XAI and declarative domain knowledge
   * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment   * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment
-  * incorporating ​ethical values into AI systems ​and the legal interpretation and consequences ​of this process+  * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems ​& its legal interpretation and consequences
   * XAI, privacy and data protection   * XAI, privacy and data protection
   * possible legal aspects and consequences of affective systems   * possible legal aspects and consequences of affective systems
   * XAI, certification and compliance   * XAI, certification and compliance
  
-==== The intended audience ==== +==== List of members of the program committee ​(tentative====
-The workshop is of particular interest for the members of AI and Law community. However, it may also be found relevant by sociologists,​ lawyers ​(e.g. judges), data protection officers, business people, policymakers,​ legislators,​ public officers, NGO and last but certainly not least engineers. ​ Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice.+
  
-==== List of members of the program committee ====  
-//​tentative//​ 
 Martin Atzmueller, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Martin Atzmueller, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
 Michal Araszkiewicz,​ Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ Michal Araszkiewicz,​ Jagiellonian University, Poland\\
Line 56: Line 67:
 David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\
 Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\
-Colette Cuijpers, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ 
-Rafał Michalczak, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ 
 Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\
 Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\
Line 64: Line 73:
 Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
 Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\
-Jose Palma, Univesidad de Murcia, Spain\\ 
 Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\
 +Juan Pavón Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\
 Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\
 Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\
-Juan Pavón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\ 
 Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics,​ Japan\\ Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics,​ Japan\\
 Erich Schweighofer,​ University of Vienna, Austria\\ Erich Schweighofer,​ University of Vienna, Austria\\
-Piotr Skrzypczyński,​ Poznań University of Technology, Poland\\ +Michal Valco, ​Constantine the Philosopher ​University ​in Nitra, Slovakia\\
-Dominik Ślęzak, Warsaw University, Poland\\ +
-Michal Valco, University ​of Presov, Slovakia\\+
 Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland
  
 ==== Important dates ==== ==== Important dates ====
 +Submission: 25.11.2019\\
 +Notification: ​ 01.12.2019\\
 +Corrected papers: 06.12.2019\\
 +Workshop: ​ 11.12.2019\\
  
-Submission: 26.04.2019\\ +====Submission and proceedings==== 
-Notification: ​ 10.05.2019\\ +Please submit ​papers ​using the dedicated Easychair installation  
-Camera-ready:​ 31.05.2019\\ +[[https://​easychair.org/​conferences/?​conf=xaila2019]] 
-Workshop: ​ 17.06.2019 +We are accepting short papers – 5 pages with references, ​and long papers – 10 pages. We are encouraging both original research papers, as well position ​papers. 
- +All submissions should be formatted using the styles and guidelines in the IOS Press Instructions for Authors http://www.iospress.nl/service/authors/​latex-and-word-tools-for-book-authors
-==== Submission and proceedings ====  +
-Please submit using the dedicated Easychair installation  +
-[[https://​easychair.org/​conferences/?​conf=xaila2019icail]] +
- +
-We accept long (8 pagesand short/​position (4 pagespapers ​in PDF only.  +
-Please use the ACM format: [[https://www.acm.org/publications/proceedings-template]] +
 Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. ​ Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. ​
 A post workshop journal publication is considered. A post workshop journal publication is considered.
 +
  
xaila/start.1553361208.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/03/23 18:13 by gjn
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0