Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| xaila:start [2021/11/05 21:56] – gjn | xaila:start [2021/11/27 17:39] (current) – [Submission and proceedings] gjn | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ===== XAILA at JURIX 2021 ===== | ===== XAILA at JURIX 2021 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The 5th International Workshop on eXplainable and Responsible AI and Law (XAILA2021@JURIX) | ||
| + | at the | ||
| + | 34th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems | ||
| + | Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania December 8, 2021 | ||
| + | [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Organizing Committee: | ||
| + | Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
| + | Martin Atzmueller, University in Osnabrück, Germany, | ||
| + | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, | ||
| + | Bart Verheij, University in Groningen | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Description ==== | ||
| + | In the last several years we have observed a growing interest in advanced AI systems achieving impressive task performance. However, there has also been an increased awareness of their complexity and challenging consequences of their possibly limited understandability to humans. In response, a number of research directions have been initiated. These include humanized or human-centered AI, as well as ethically aligned, ethically designed, or just ethical AI. For many of these ideas, the principal concept seems to be the explanatory capability of the AI system (XAI), e.g. via interpretable and explainable machine learning, inclusion of human background knowledge and adequate declarative knowledge, that could provide foundations not only for transparency and understandability, | ||
| + | Recently, the term responsible AI (RAI) has been coined as a step beyond XAI. Discussion of RAI has again been strongly influenced by the “ethical” perspective. However, as practitioners in our fields we are convinced that the advancements of AI are way too fast, and the ethical perspective much too vague to offer conclusive and constructive results. We are convinced that the concepts of responsibility, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Topics of interest ==== | ||
| + | Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI and RAI topics | ||
| + | * the notions of transparency, | ||
| + | * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems | ||
| + | * legal consequences of black-box AI systems | ||
| + | * legal criteria and requirements for explainable, | ||
| + | * criteria of legal responsibility discussed in the context of intelligent systems operation and the role of explainability in liability ascription | ||
| + | * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | ||
| + | * legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life | ||
| + | * the notion of right to explanation | ||
| + | * relation of XAI and RAI to argumentation technologies | ||
| + | * approaches and architectures for XAI and RAI in AI systems | ||
| + | * XAI, RAI and declarative domain knowledge | ||
| + | * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment | ||
| + | * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems, its legal interpretation and consequences | ||
| + | * XAI, privacy and data protection (conceptual and theoretical issues) | ||
| + | * XAI, certification and compliance | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Important dates ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Submission: | ||
| + | Notification: | ||
| + | Camera-ready: | ||
| + | Workshop: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Submission and proceedings ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | We accept regular/ | ||
| + | https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Program Committee (tbe & tbc) ==== | ||
| + | Martin Atzmüller, Osnabrück University, Germany\\ | ||
| + | Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
| + | Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | ||
| + | Floris Bex, Utrecht University, the Netherlands\\ | ||
| + | Szymon Bobek, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | ||
| + | Georg Borges, Universität des Saarlandes, Germany\\ | ||
| + | Jörg Cassens, University of Hildesheim, Germany\\ | ||
| + | David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
| + | Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | ||
| + | Enrico Francesconi, | ||
| + | Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
| + | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | ||
| + | Tiago Oliveira, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
| + | Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
| + | Jose Palma, Universidad de Murcia, Spain\\ | ||
| + | Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | ||
| + | Juan Pavón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
| + | Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | ||
| + | Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | ||
| + | Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
| + | Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel, | ||
| + | Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
| + | Jaromír Šavelka, Carnegie Mellon University, USA\\ | ||
| + | Erich Schweighofer, | ||
| + | Piotr Skrzypczyński, | ||
| + | Michal Valco, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia\\ | ||
| + | Bart Verheij, University of Groningen, The Netherlands\\ | ||
| + | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland | ||
